From 1ad6bfffbeb3a008ef1b5e0a7730d19d951120f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Saivann Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 15:16:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify requirements for the "transparency" score (thanks @harding) --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 521e6d6e..46a1a393 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ To get a passing score, the wallet must rely on random nodes, either by using th To get a good score, the wallet must deserve a passing score and be built deterministically. -To get a passing score, the wallet must be open-source, under version control and releases must be clearly identified (e.g. by tags or commits). The codebase must be public since at least 6 months and previous commits must remain unchanged. +To get a passing score, the wallet must be open-source, under version control and releases must be clearly identified (e.g. by tags or commits). The codebase and final releases must be public since at least 6 months and previous commits must remain unchanged. **Environment** - How secure is the environment of the wallet?