Fix incorrect usage of 'script' rather than 'scriptPubKey'

This is causing quite a bit of confusion, for example by people looking
in the Bitcoin Core sourcecode and seeing the term 'scriptPubKey'
instead.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Todd 2014-09-18 21:10:31 -04:00 committed by David Harding
parent d27cf78449
commit 9183f98bc1
6 changed files with 73 additions and 73 deletions

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ The following subsections briefly document core transaction details.
{% autocrossref %}
The op codes used in standard transactions are,
The op codes used in the scriptPubKeys of standard transactions are:
* Various data pushing op codes from 0x00 to 0x4e (1--78). These aren't
typically shown in examples, but they must be used to push
@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ fa 20 9c 6a 85 2d d9 06
ed ce 25 85 7f cd 37 04
00 00 00 00 previous output index
48 size of script (var_uint)
48 size of scriptSig (var_uint)
scriptSig for input 0:
47 push 71 bytes to stack
30 44 02 20 4e 45 e1 69
32 b8 af 51 49 61 a1 d3
@ -190,8 +191,8 @@ ff ff ff ff sequence number
output 0:
00 ca 9a 3b 00 00 00 00 amount = 10.00000000 BTC
43 size of script (var_uint)
script for output 0:
43 size of scriptPubKey (var_uint)
scriptPubKey for output 0:
41 push 65 bytes to stack
04 ae 1a 62 fe 09 c5 f5
1b 13 90 5f 07 f0 6b 99
@ -206,8 +207,8 @@ ac OP_CHECKSIG
output 1:
00 28 6b ee 00 00 00 00 amount = 40.00000000 BTC
43 size of script (var_uint)
script for output 1:
43 size of scriptPubKey (var_uint)
scriptPubKey for output 1:
41 push 65 bytes to stack
04 11 db 93 e1 dc db 8a
01 6b 49 84 0f 8c 53 bc