mirror of
https://github.com/seigler/dash-docs
synced 2025-07-28 18:26:13 +00:00
Revert "Merge pull #793: Dev Docs: New Glossary & JS Search Box"
This reverts commite3dcf0ce1f
, reversing changes made toc71e9fdf2d
. Once again we had a broken new plugin that Travis CI and local building didn't catch.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3dcf0ce1f
commit
961d6c988f
126 changed files with 470 additions and 3827 deletions
|
@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ displayed on high-resolution screens.
|
|||
|
||||
{% autocrossref %}
|
||||
|
||||
Bitcoin Core 0.9 supports the new [payment protocol][/en/glossary/payment-protocol]{:#term-payment-protocol}{:.term}. The payment protocol
|
||||
Bitcoin Core 0.9 supports the new [payment protocol][]{:#term-payment-protocol}{:.term}. The payment protocol
|
||||
adds many important features to payment requests:
|
||||
|
||||
- Supports X.509 certificates and SSL encryption to verify receivers' identity
|
||||
|
@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ for more details.
|
|||
|
||||
{% autocrossref %}
|
||||
|
||||
As explained in the [Transactions][] and [Block Chain][section block chain] sections, broadcasting
|
||||
As explained in the [Transactions][] and [Block Chain][] sections, broadcasting
|
||||
a transaction to the network doesn't ensure that the receiver gets
|
||||
paid. A malicious spender can create one transaction that pays the
|
||||
receiver and a second one that pays the same input back to himself. Only
|
||||
|
@ -431,20 +431,20 @@ one of these transactions will be added to the block chain, and nobody
|
|||
can say for sure which one it will be.
|
||||
|
||||
Two or more transactions spending the same input are commonly referred
|
||||
to as a [double spend][/en/glossary/double-spend]{:#term-double-spend}{:.term}.
|
||||
to as a [double spend][]{:#term-double-spend}{:.term}.
|
||||
|
||||
Once the transaction is included in a block, double spends are
|
||||
impossible without modifying block chain history to replace the
|
||||
transaction, which is quite difficult. Using this system,
|
||||
the Bitcoin protocol can give each of your transactions an updating confidence
|
||||
score based on the number of blocks which would need to be modified to replace
|
||||
a transaction. For each block, the transaction gains one [confirmation][/en/glossary/confirmation-score]{:#term-confirmation}{:.term}. Since
|
||||
a transaction. For each block, the transaction gains one [confirmation][]{:#term-confirmation}{:.term}. Since
|
||||
modifying blocks is quite difficult, higher confirmation scores indicate
|
||||
greater protection.
|
||||
|
||||
**0 confirmations**: The transaction has been broadcast but is still not
|
||||
included in any block. Zero confirmation transactions (unconfirmed
|
||||
transactions) should generally not be
|
||||
included in any block. Zero confirmation transactions ([unconfirmed
|
||||
transactions][]{:#term-unconfirmed-transactions}{:.term}) should generally not be
|
||||
trusted without risk analysis. Although miners usually confirm the first
|
||||
transaction they receive, fraudsters may be able to manipulate the
|
||||
network into including their version of a transaction.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue